|Russian Revolution's Forum|
Crowdfunding for book
the Vedas of Russ in 3 volumes
Modernization of Russia
Holy Russia - Third Rome
The new subject of international law, the State Holy Russia - Third Rome, 21.09.2013.
Nova Church of Holy Russia
Orthodoxy and Christianity require reforming and release of heresy and obscurantism. 21.09.2011.
The Seljuk Dynasty Origin New!!!
The author put forward a hypothesis according to which the Seljuk’s Sultans came from the Princes of the Russ – Rurikovich Kin, who eventually converted to Islam. The hypothesis was fully confirmed by the identification of the main historical figures of the Seljuk dynasty with the descendants of the Princes St. Vladimir and Yaroslav the Wise. We are talking about the rulers of Sultanate of Rum Sultan Suleiman and his descendants, as well as Tuqaq, Seljuk, Mikail, Israel, Toghrul, Alp Arslan and other Sultans. Princes and their sons from the Principality of Tmutarakan became Seljuk’s Sultans, from where they conquered the countries and peoples of the Caucasus, Iran, Asia Minor and Central Asia. 24.05–12.06.2023.
Synchronization of historical and religious Chronicles
The author correctly synchronizes historical and religious Chronicles of the Ancient World based on a short chronology and linking events to unique celestial phenomena reflected in the annals and Scriptures. The author believes that discrepancies in dates, geographical localities and ethnic origin of historical and religious figures are due to erroneous traditional chronology and historical geography, as well as the deliberate adaptation of phenomena and events to an established paradigm. 20.04–25.05.2020.
Astronomical dating of Biblical events
The author's reconstruction of the history and chronology of religions is fully verified by identifying 15 celestial phenomena described in the Chronicles, including 11 Solar Eclipses, 3 Zodiacs and 1 Supernova. A chronological shift of 1780 years in the history of Ancient Egypt has been confirmed for 6 phenomena, including 3 Solar Eclipses and 3 Zodiacs, including the Eclipse of Pharaoh Takelot on August 8, 891. Astronomically confirmed the date of the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ as March 18, 1010, and the date of death of Ibrahim – the son of the Prophet Muhammad as February 7, 1152 (28 Shawwal 546 AH). 20.02–31.03.2020.
Origin of the gens Rurik
After the break of ties between the metropolis and the Russian principalities, the annals of Byzantium were cleared of the mention of "foreigners" in the management of the Empire, and the Chronicles of Russia did not have time to properly reflect the role of Rurik in world history. A study of the sources of Ancient Rome, New Rome, Russia, Arab countries, Danube and Volga Bulgaria allowed the author to identify the Russ gens and Bulgarian Khagans with the Flavian dynasty, as well as to identify Rurik, his descendants and relatives from the Macedonian dynasty (IX–XI century) and dynasty of Lecapenus (X century). The last Russian Emperor of New Rome been Yaroslav the Wise, throne name Constantine Monomachos. 11.09–21.10.2019.
Chronology of monotheistic religions
The author identified the Patriarchs of monotheism with well-known figures of human history. He proved that the oldest religion of monotheism is Christianity, which had a theoretical character in the I Millennium (Old Testament Christianity) and a practical embodiment at the beginning of the II Millennium (New Testament Christianity). Islam and Judaism emerged only in the early VII century and became radical branches of Christianity. Based on the study of solar eclipses, the author has determined the date and place of the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ (March 18, 1010 in Constantinople), the year of the death of the Prophet Muhammad (1152) and the period creation of the Quran (1130–1152). 01–27.08.2019.
Localization of Ancient Rome
The history of Ancient Rome is well studied, but hides a lot of inconsistencies and contradictions relating to the period of formation of the city and the expansion of the Romans into the world. We believe that the problems are caused by ignorance of the true localization of Ancient Rome in the Volga region on Akhtuba until the Fire on 64 and move city to location of Veii in Italy. The article also considers the aspects of ethnic origin of the peoples of the Latin League, Ancient Rome and Europe. The vector of expansion of Ancient Rome from the Volga region to the Europe coinciding with the migration flows of the Migration Period and the spread of PIE is substantiated. In addition the article considers the dynamics of growth and decline of the population of Ancient Rome in the localities from its inception to sunset and transformation. 23.06–16.07.2019.
Short chronology of Ancient Egypt
The history of Ancient Egypt generated in XIX century, every day finds out all greater discrepancy to modern realities both the newest archeological and tool data, including results of DNA researches of mummies of the Egyptian pharaohs. The chronology of Egypt as whole is considered well investigated and however it has been created for substantiation of an antiquity of Jewish people, instead of for scientific description of one of most ancient terrestrial civilizations. Author's reconstruction of chronology of Ancient Egypt has found out time shift at rate 1780 years in depth of centuries from true dating events. 1-16.06.2019.
Great Tartary or Slavic Empire
The next riddle of world historiography is solved. Present clause is devoted to history and modern condition of one of the most grandiose empires of terrestrial civilization – Great Tartary or Slavic Empires. 04–19.09.2017.
The European Aryans
In present clause the broad audience of the questions connected to probable Aryan origin of various European peoples is considered. Including aspects of possible an Aryan origin of Slavs and prospects of presence by these of special way to world around are considered. 25.02.2017 - 24.03.2017.
Summarizing of Zemsky Sobor 2016 (Land Assembly 2016)
Within the framework of carrying out Zemsky Sobor 2016 (Land Assembly 2016) on elections of Grand Prince of All Russia four Nominees have been put forward. The overwhelming majority of voices have been given for Nominee Grand Prince Valeriy Viktorovich Kubarev. Will of God and decision of participants of Assembly, Zemsky Sobor 2016 has elected lifelong Grand Prince of All Russia Valeriy Viktorovich Kubarev Grand Kubensky Rurikovich. 11.05.2016.
Yaroslavl’s Princes Rurikovich
In clause is described family tree of Grand Princes of Yaroslavl and their descendants, it is the senior branch of the Kin of Russ – Rurikovich, going back to Mstislav Great Monomachos. Kin of the Grand Princes of Yaroslavl have continued by Princes Grand Kubensky – Kubarev. 22.02.2016–11.03.2016.
All truth about Saint Prince Vladimir
In clause the all truth about Saint Prince Vladimir which is ignored Orthodox and Romanov’s historians, communistic historical science and their modern adepts, fabricating myths about Russ with « good intentions » opens without denominations. The kin of Russ - Rurikovich has created Orthodoxy and the Russian statehood, Russian people began to forget about it. Glory to Russ! 07-17.07.2015.
Brief chronology of religions
The report at XXX International conference on problems of the Civilization, 25.04.2015, Moscow, RosNoU. In the clause the final Chronological Tables of Ancient Egypt, Ancient and New Rome, Rome in Italy, Christianity, Islam and Judaism are submitted. 25.04.2015.
Canons of Orthodoxy of XIV century and the present time
The report at XXIX International conference on problems of the Civilization, 20.12.2014, Moscow, RosNoU. In the report the comparative analysis of canons of Orthodoxy of XIV century (1315-1321), displayed on mosaics and frescos of Church of Chorus in Istanbul, and modern doctrines are made. Numerous differences of events of the Holy Legend and the Gospel of the past and the present are found out. 20.12.2014.
Ethnic threats to peoples of Russia
In clause political, economic, cultural and religious aspects of consequences of ethnic opposition of radical peoples of Russia and new coming Slavic population formed as result of violent Slavic expansion in Russia in days of the Mongolian yoke are considered. The historical reasons of occurrence of ethnic contradictions are investigated, estimations of modern condition of problem (Chechelevskaya and Lubotinskaya Republics in 1905, Donetsk national republic and Lugansk national republic in 2014 in territory of Ukraine) are given and offers on decrease in escalation of ethnic opposition in territory of Eurasia are made. 09.06 - 05.07.2014.
Attribution of Rurikovich and Emperors Lecapenus
The report at XXVIII International Conference on problems of the Civilization is 26.04.2014, Moscow, RosNoU. In clause it is described detailed attribution of Ugrian Tsars with Emperors of Ancient and New Rome and Patriarches of terrestrial civilization. It is scientifically proved origins of all patriarches of monotheism and Emperors Flavius and Lecapenus from kint of Ugrian Tsars of Russ (Great), is the ethnic Finn-Ugrian from Volga region. 23.03.2014 – 24.04.2014.
Putin's Eurasian impasse
Vladimir Putin and Uniform Russia realize the Eurasian project, involving Russia and Russian people during stagnation and backlogs from World Civilization. They create Gog and Magog Empire, menacing to world peace. Why the Kremlin authority has not asked Russian Slavs – they want to live in the Asian country or to be safe Europeans? 14-22.01.2014.
Projections of the God in symbols of religion
As result of studying the extensive visual material created by 3D modeling, we have proved existence of uniform source of an origin of Projections of the God, that is religious symbolic of people. The source or quantum object refers to the Chariot of the God. We believe that on the basis of our researches, it will be possible to organize training to travel on the Universe of space navigators from the most gifted people and to create spaceships with engines as the described quantum generator is Chariots of the God or the Chariot of Cube. 25–30.08.2013.
Origin and migration of Slavs
Historical and genetic routes of migrations of the Slavs, calculated with the help from ancient Byzantium, European, Chinese, Arabian, Bulgarian and Russian chronicles and annals, and also modern researches of man's DNA chromosomes. 01-21.05.2013.
Empires of cousins of Russ
The report at scientific XXVI International conference on problems of the Civilization 26-27.04.2013, Moscow, RosNoU. In article five world Empires of cousins of Russ (Great) existing in our era on open spaces of Eurasia with cyclicity of occurrence once in 300 years are described.
Hungarian Kingdom of Russ
It is continuation of research of dynastic communications of Rurikovich. Cousin of Rurik Almysh/Almos and his children Kazan/Kurszan and Arbat/Arpad, it is all ethnic Ugrian of Russ, have based at the end of IX century – beginning of X century the Hungarian kingdom of Russ, having grasped Great Moravia. 08-11.01.2013.
Reconstruction of dynastic communications of Rurikovich in IX-XI centuries
Report at anniversary scientific XXV International conference on problems of civilization at 21-22.12.2012, RosNoU, Moscow. Corrected at 03.01.2013.
Educated Christianity of Russ
Bible – the Old Testament and the New Testament has exhausted itself. Forged the Scripts and the Sacred Legend cannot serve more as a spiritual reference point for promotion of mankind forward on the river of time. It is allowable to use only spiritual – moral potential of the ancient products being product of national creativity of Jews and Catholics, instead of divine revelations. The chronology of Bible events, an ethnic accessory of patriarchs of mankind, names, geography and original languages of heroes of the Bible do not correspond to the validity. Bible miracles have the quantum nature in the basis and submit to laws of a universe. Educated Christianity of Russ restore the religious both destroyed obscurantists religious and scientific knowledge of Christianity and revolutionary role of religion in history of civilization. 26.08. – 12.10.2012.
True Empty Tomb
Nova Church of Sacred Russia and Sacred Russ, Princes of Russia congratulates mankind on presence of True Empty Tomb and restoration of the religious and historical truth. The true has triumphed forever. 20-29.05.2012.
Orthodoxy and Islam in Old Russia
The report at XXIV International scientific conference on problems of the Civilization in Russian New University on April 20-21, 2012.
Day of Church Slavonic writing. Russ Cyril and Methodius.
In this significant holiday of Day of Church Slavonic writing and remembering Equal Apostles Sacred Cyril and Methodius, Princes of Russ convincingly ask Russian Orthodox Church and the public of the orthodox countries to return to sources and correctly to name the writing, language and church books Russian, but not Slavic. Ancient Russia was the Finno-Ugric state created by Russ Christians Rurik and Igor, Cyril and Methodius, Askold and Dir, Prophetic Oleg and Sacred Olga, Sacred Vladimir and Empress Anna Macedonian.
Wars of Russ in IX-XI centuries
In article on a rich actual material it is shown, that all wars of Russ with Byzantium in 836-1043 have been connected to deduction of a throne of empire by Russian party of Constantinople headed by the Macedonian dynasty of Russ. To the author it is proved, that two centuries co-emperors of New Rome were Great Princes Rurikovich. Last Russian emperor Jaroslav Mudry known in Tsar Grad as Constantine Monomakh was. The report at scientific XXII International conference on problems of the Civilization 22-23.04.2011, Moscow, RosNoU.
Genetic distances between cousins Rurikovich
The report at scientific XXII International Conference on problems of the Civilization, on April 22-23, 2011, RosNoU, Moscow, Russia. 24.04.2011.
Slavic-Mongolian invasion to Russia
Results of our research of an origin of Slavs have not simply scientific, but political value. In view of the received data it is necessary to form the weighed policy of interethnic and inter religious attitudes in Russia and the world. The modern hobby of Russian Slavs Rodoverie, the Aries origin and the contemptuous attitude to inhabitants of Central Asia, Caucasus, Mongolia, China and other regions of the world bears a system and logic mistake. Rodoverie in general it is senseless, in fact ancestors Rodoverian in Russia and Ukraine have left Central Asia and were Kirghiz, Altaian’s, Tajik’s, Pashtun’s, Uyghur’s and Juan-Juan, and completely not blond demigods. 12-18.03.2011.
Old Rome and Italic union of the Volga region
The scientific article on an extensive historical material proves that Ancient Rome has been created by Finno-Ugric tribe’s of Italic union of the Volga region (Idel, Bulgar). Italic peoples Vestini (Vesi), Marsi (Merya), Lucani (Lucane), Marrucini (Marri) and others till now live on Volga. Finno-Ugric named Latinas (Latinyanami) German peoples of the Volga region, differently Altyn-ami that means Gold literally. Fortress Alba Longo was called Altynbash, and Volga region Rome – Ulak-Urum. Southwest capital of Finno-Ugric of Idel was city Phanagoria or the Finn–Ugoria, being in antiquities capital Bosporus Empire and Great Bulgaria was. The web of lies of the western falsifiers of history how many would not be twisted, but to it all the same there comes the end. 10-21.02.2011.
We have proved fidelity Bulgarian theory of an origin of mankind. She proves to be true a natural vector of moving of people on a planet from the Volga region in all parties of Eurasia, and there from to Africa, Australia and America. All peoples and races of the world have taken place from Hindi-European, namely – from ethnic Finno-Ugric. 01-07.02.2011.
Correct DNA-Genealogy and glottochronology
Scientific article of Grand Prince Valeriy Kubarev on DNA-Genealogy and glottochronology is submitted to your attention. The author has created formulas with which help it is possible to define precisely time of life of the general ancestor and an epoch of formation of various languages. These formulas have received the name of Kubarev’s formula. With the help of mathematical calculations, Valeriy Kubarev has proved fidelity Barrow of Hypothesis of Maria Gimbutas and own reconstruction of a history of the world. We hope that results of research will find wide application in DNA-Genealogy and glottochronology. 04-14.01.2011.
Genealogy and genetics of Princes of Russia
The report of Grand Prince Valeriy Kubarev at XXI International Conference on problems of the Civilization 25.12.2010. Valeriy Kubarev's scientific article describes genetics of Rurikovich and Sorts of Russia. Grand Prince has scientifically defined modal haplotype of Rurik, Gedimin, Russ Aydar, Kubrat, Flavius and has theoretically described modal haplotype of Alexander Great, Jesus Christ Zlatoust, Prophet Mohammed and Genghis Khan. All these well-known people ethnically Finno-Ugrian from the Sort of Russ. 25.12.2010.
What do we celebrate on November 4? Loss of the national sovereignty...
National voting or voting of national representatives is unacceptable for elections of Tsar and Grand Duke, in fact tsar from the God, and the voice of people is not a voice Divine. Elections of Grand Duke only voting of Princes – patrimonial aristocracy of Russia are possible. 08-21.11.2010.
Turn of the Earth promptly comes nearer
This is article with the analysis of abnormal geophysical and climatic activity on a planet. 09-12.09.2010.
Baltavar – a symbol of Christianity, an Islam and Judaism
Petrarca: « When people will address to the history, his greatness come to live »
History of Russ about 3506 BC till 2012
Kubarev V.V.'s report, History of Russ about 3506 BC till 2012.
Section «Civilization aspects of the Russian history and chronology».
Tenth International scientific conference «Civilization of knowledge: global crisis and an innovative choice of Russia», Moscow, April 24-25, 2009, RosNOU.
Whose fault is it?
The Catechon Paradigm as an instrument of the Antichrist New!!!
In the article, the author examines the current state of the catechon paradigm and the practice of using the provisions of the concept in the political and public life of the Russian Federation. According to the author, the idea of the catechon in Russia was intercepted by the forces of evil and used as a screen to cover their deeds. Today, the catechon paradigm has become an instrument of the Antichrist and his adherents to gain world domination. The only resource for Lucifer’s conquest of the world is sinful people whom he can attract under his banners. As successful as his deception and seduction will be, so strong and numerous will be the army of Satan. 05–17.12.2022.
Impairment of Orthodoxy New!!!
In the article, the author has carried out a retrospective analysis of the events and processes that led to the impairment and transformation of the canons of Orthodoxy and the patristic tradition of Russian Christianity. Prohibitions and reliance on the good intentions of opportunists within the body of the church led to a natural distortion of the teaching. As a result, the Orthodox Church became vulnerable to the pressure of Lucifer's lies and deception and ceased to be a source of life. 30.09–25.11.2022.
Features of Christianity in Cappadocia New!!!
The usual facts for Cappadocia were the proximity of male and female Monasteries and their communication. The plots and frescoes of the Churches were created no earlier than the first quarter of the XI century. The isomorphic images of St. George, Theodore Stratelates and Theodore Tiron have come down to us. According to the author, St. George became a collective image of the Saints Constantine the Great and the two Theodores. The fresco of the Serpent Church depicts Onuphrius the Great as a hermaphrodite, which the Church is trying to forget. On the face of the purposeful distortion by Christianity of the Holy Tradition, led by the Holy Spirit, and the removal from the original sources. 05–28.08.2022.
Based on a thorough analysis of the chronicles of New Rome, Ancient Russia, Great Bulgaria and Arab sources, the author has justified the Finno–Ugric origin of the Macedonian Dynasty and the Lekapenos Dynasty. The details of the biographies, names, dates of rule and family ties of dozens of Emperors, Khagans and Princes of Byzantium, Russ and Bulgar coincide with great accuracy, which makes it possible to identify all the studied personalities with real historical figures. In local chronicles, they have different or identical names, depending on the national characteristics of the nicknames of the studied persons. 07.12.2020–30.01.2021.
Dancing on bones (people losses of USSR in SWW)
We have found out the facts of direct falsification of human losses of military men and civil persons of the USSR within the Second World War in some millions person. Forgery is caused by activity of the propaganda machine of the USSR and false understanding of patriotism in modern Russia. By our calculations true irrevocable losses of the population of the USSR within the SWW make 7.6–8.7 million persons from among military men and the general losses with civil people 12.8–13.9 million persons. Have run away from Stalin paradise of USSR is hundred thousand (up to 1.3 million) the persons. We believe that the name of each victim of war should be taken into account and sounded publicly. 04–18.05.2019.
Expansion of Rome from Volga region
The report at XXXIII International conference on problems of the Civilization, 24.12.2016, Moscow, RosNoU. In the report the extensive information on resettlement of peoples to Europe through ports of Bosporan Kingdom and Bosporus to the Mediterranean from the Volga region, Siberia and Caucasus during existence of Ancient Rome in delta of the rivers Volga and Akhtuba since VI century B.C. up to middle of VI century is submitted. 24.12.2016.
Seleucus and tribal leaders of Rome
The report at scientific XXXI International Conference on problems of the Civilization has acted on December 26, 2015, RosNoU, Moscow, Russia. In the report the hypothesis that "Macedonian" gains of IV century B.C. actually are the first wave of expansion of Ancient Rome and resettlement of peoples on South, East and West from territory of the Volga region and Caucasus is put forward and proved. 26.12.2015.
Picturesque Gospel of Church of Chora (Kariye) in Istanbul
Research of artifacts of Church of the Christ Savior in Chora (Church of Chorus, XIV century, Istanbul) has allowed restoring overlooked nuances of ancient doctrines of Byzantium Orthodoxy. The numerous facts of distortion Holy Book and Holy Legend have been found out at formation of modern Christian canons which at all are not an inviolable reality from above, and there is product of human creativity. 15.09–08.10.2014.
Images ancient Romans from Volga in artefacts
Long millennia in Idel-Rome-Memphis-Mitsraim-Itil-Saray-Batu lived from 600 000 up to one million person. Ruins of city are grandiose pantry of a history, culture and religion. Masonic scientists diligently avoid carrying out there scale excavation. In those places prospers only black selector of treasures. How long it is possible to hide to world elite of impostors true from people? 20-22.04.2010.
What to do?
Sixth and other questions New!!!
Why doesn't the ROC want to stop the war? 14.02.2022.
Five questions to the ROC New!!!
The first question: What is the data of the Birth of Christ now?
The second question: When and where was Jesus Christ crucified?
The third question: When will the Apocalypse begin?
Fourth question: Why Tartarus and the Kingdom of The Beast located in Russia?
The fifth question: When did Vladimir Putin become the receptacle of the Beast? 24-27.01.2022.
The Prophet Muhammad and the Quran
Based on an independent analysis of artifacts, ancestral tree and astronomical phenomena related to the deeds, life and death of the Prophet Muhammad, as well as historical evidence of the first appearance and legal use of the Quran in the life of Muslims, the author drew conclusions about the integration of several historical figures of the VII and XII centuries into the personality of the Prophet Muhammad. They became Khagan Kubrat, aka Emperor Heraclius, the Arabian Prophet or Caliph of the Rashidun Caliphs and the true Prophet Muhammad, who lived in 1090–1052. The Quran was created in 1130–1152. The proposed interpretation does not undermine the canons of the faith of Islam, but establishes the truth. 11–30.11.2021.
Syncing the chronicles of Rome and Egypt
Based on a thorough analysis of details of military campaigns and astronomical phenomena from the chronicles of Ancient and New Rome, Ancient Egypt and Persian sources, the author confirmed the chronological shift in the history of Ancient Egypt by 1780 years in the past. The author also revealed the complot of historians to conceal the existence of Ancient Egypt in I millennium by masking the deeds of the Egyptian Pharaohs of the New Kingdom for the non-existent activity of the Kings of the Sasanian Empire. 06–29.03.2021.
The identification of the Patriarchs with historical figures
The author correctly identifies the Patriarchs of monotheistic religions with historical figures of the past based on the paradigm of a short chronology of the world and linking events to unique celestial phenomena reflected in Chronicles and Scriptural. The identification of the Patriarchs is based on the analysis of data from the genealogical trees of Jesus Christ from Lucas, Matthew, mosaics of the Church of Chora, the genealogical tree of the Prophet Muhammad and lists of the Kings of the Great Bulgaria. 21.07–27.08.2020.
We have found out and have proved that at everyone men are two direct lines of Pure Relationship on which in each generation of ancestors he has only one pair pure relatives – the forefather and the foremother. All other ancestors are the listed relatives. We also have proved that each woman has two direct lines of Pure Relationship on which in each generation of ancestors it has only one pair foremothers. On the basis of research we confirm De Facto firmness of the absolute law of succession is rule Lex Salica of Pure Relationship. 05.08 – 03.09.2014.
To be continued...
Thoughts aloud: Religion
Thoughts aloud: Politics
Thoughts aloud: Advice
To be continued...
||Valery KUBAREV > Modernization of Russia > The Seljuk Dynasty Origin
The Seljuk Dynasty Origin
Kubarev V.V., The Seljuks Dynasty Origin, East European Scientific Journal (Warsaw, Poland), #5 (90), 2023 part 1. pp. 4–20. Link:
Summary: The author put forward a hypothesis according to which the Seljuk’s Sultans came from the Princes of the Russ – Rurikovich Kin, who eventually converted to Islam. The hypothesis was fully confirmed by the identification of the main historical figures of the Seljuk dynasty with the descendants of the Princes St. Vladimir and Yaroslav the Wise. We are talking about the rulers of Sultanate of Rum Sultan Suleiman and his descendants, as well as Tuqaq, Seljuk, Mikail, Israel, Toghrul, Alp Arslan and other Sultans. Princes and their sons from the Principality of Tmutarakan became Seljuk’s Sultans, from where they conquered the countries and peoples of the Caucasus, Iran, Asia Minor and Central Asia.
Key words: Seljuk’s, Russ, Rurikovich, Tmutarakan, Princes, Sultans, Sultanate of Rum, Tuqaq, Mikail, Israel, Toghrul, Alp Arslan, St. Vladimir, Yaroslav the Wise.
The basic material: Recently, the author suggested that the Seljuk’s are representatives of an ancient royal family related to the Rurikovich, who converted to Islam. However, during the identification of Princes and Sultans, there were chronological gaps lasting more than 30 years. The names and nicknames of historical figures confused the reconstruction of events. In addition, European dating of the life of the Sultans did not coincide with Arabic and Persian sources.
The author hypothesized that the founders of the Seljuk Dynasties were representatives of the Russ Kin, the former Princes of Tmutarakan. Let's justify this statement. Information about the Princes of Tmutarakan will be summarized in Table No. 1.
In the East, it is believed that Seljuk Bey lived for about 100 years. According to Rashid Al-Din , he lived 107 years. European historians are convinced that he died in 1009 near Bukhara. At the same time, it is believed that his son Mikail (Mikhail) also died in 1009, although according to Sadr Al-Din Al-Husayni, Beg Mikail fought back in 1035 . This source assures  that Seljuk left three sons – Mikael, Musa (Moses) and Arslan (Israel). The author Gregory Bar Hebraeus also believes . According to Rashid Al-Din , he had five sons plus Yusuf (Joseph) and Yunus (Jonah). The information from Sadr Al-Din Al-Husaini is doubtful, because his book first entered scientific use in 1980 and looks like a new model book.
From the whole array of contradictory data, the author stopped first at identifying Mikail and his son Tughril Beg (Prince Falcon), so that then it would be possible to identify the rest of the relatives.
Mikail/Mikhail ibn Seljuk (?-1009/1035) is the son of Seljuk, the founder of the dynasty, whose children became the rulers of the Seljuk Empire . The year of the ruler's birth is unknown. Mikhail had two sons – Chaghri Beg (Falcon, Gyrfalcon) and Tughril Beg (Falcon). Beg means Prince. According to Sadr Al-Din , Mikhail had a third son or nephew, Ertash Yabghu. The years of life are  for Chaghri Beg (989-1060) and Tughril Beg (990-1063). The younger brother ruled Khorasan (northeastern Iran and Central Asia) in 1038-1063. Chaghri Beg had 4 or 6 sons – Alp Arslan (1030-1072) assumed the throne of the Empire in 1063, Qavurt (1031-1073) became the ruler of Kerman, and Yakuti – the governor of Azerbaijan, and 4 daughters.
The youngest son of Mikhail the Tughril Beg did not have children. The Sultan's totem was a falcon. The heir to the Empire was his nephew Alp Arslan (the bold lion) aka Muhammad in 1063 , who died in 1073. Alp Arslan had four sons and several daughters.
Let us note that the eastern dating of the life of the first Seljuk’s is clearly overstated in order to make the genus more ancient than it actually is. It is doubtful that Seljuk lived 107 years, and his grandchildren 71 and 72 years in the conditions of Central Asia and in continuous wars and campaigns.
We also note that in the main source about the Russian Princes – the TBY of Nestor , a shift of 11 years appears in the chronology of events after the death of Yaroslav the Wise in 1054. In 1065, a double celestial phenomenon is mentioned – a total solar eclipse and a Supernova M1 outbreak of the star, which occurred in 1054. Accordingly, the dating of the events of Russia in the second half of the XI century can sometimes be overstated by 11 years.
According to the author's reconstruction, Mikhail ibn Seljuk is completely identified with Rostislav Vladimirovich, in baptism Mikhail is the son of Vladimir and grandson of Yaroslav the Wise, Prince of Tmutarakan. Years of the Prince's life is 1020?-1067. Mikhail had three sons – Rurik (Clear Falcon), Volodar, also Princes Tmutarakan, and Vasilko.
The eldest son of Mikhail with the name of the legendary Rurik was considered an outcast Prince. Information about his deeds and reign is completely absent in the Russian chronicles. Rurik had no children and died in 1092, but he managed to transfer his possessions to his brothers – Volodar and Vasilko.
So, Mikhail ibn Seljuk and Tughril Beg correspond to the Russ Princes Rostislav Vladimirovich and his son Rurik. It is also known that the children of Seljuk were Christians, like himself . Over time, the Seljuk’s adopted Sunni Islam. It should be noted that the dates of death of Tughril and Rurik differ by 31 years, and the difference in the dates of death of both Mikhail’s is 32 years. The received discrepancies speak about the distortion of the history of Russia and the Seljuk’s in the X-XI centuries, which often happened with the chronology of Ancient Russia .
Mikhail was the Prince of Tmutarakan in 1064-1067 and was considered an outcast Prince without the right to the thrones of the Principalities of Russ. Relative of Rostislav Vladimirovich – Oleg Svyatoslavich, also baptized name Mikhail (1048/1050?-1115), Prince of Tmutarakan, was listed as the ruler of significant lands – Archon (ruler) Matrakhia (Taman and Kuban), Zikhiya (North Caucasus) and the whole Khazaria. These regalia are mentioned on his state seals . Thus, the ruler of Tmutarakan controlled vast territories and many peoples, which was more than the possessions of traditional Ancient Russ. Therefore, the state of Tmutarakan was not a piece of land on Taman at all.
Russian historical science in the years of the Romanovs, the USSR and modern Russia tried in every possible way to belittle the role of Tmutarakan. It is believed that with the strengthening of the Cumans, Tmutarakan was separated from Russia and lost its importance in the 1130-1140s . This statement is partly true, because the children of the Princes of Tmutarakan converted to Islam and founded the Seljuk Empire.
In reality, the activity of the Seljuk’s was justified by the claims of the Russ – Rurik Dynasty and the Saklan dynasty of Volga Bulgaria to the throne of New Rome – Constantinople [10, 11]. After all, the Co-Emperors of New Rome at one time were the Lekapenos (Rurikovich and the Saklan dynasty, including Baltavar and Emperor Mikhail), Saint Vladimir – Co-Emperor Basil II the Bulgar Slayer, and Yaroslav the Wise – Constantine Monomachos. When Constantine Monomachos failed to transfer the throne of the Empire to his son Vsevolod even after his marriage to Princess Irina/Anna Monomachos, then part of the Russian Princes decided to take revenge for the political defeat. One of the most active supporters of the restoration of Russia to the throne of New Rome was Prince Vladimir Yaroslavich, previously a participant in military and naval campaigns against Byzantium. His sons and grandsons continued his efforts through wars and seizures of Byzantine lands.
It should be noted that the Principality of Tmutarakan, after the defeat of the Khazar Khaganate by Prince Svyatoslav, went to his son Saint Vladimir (933-1015), in the baptism Basil. Then the Principality passed to his son Mstislav Vladimirovich the Brave, in the baptism Constantine (980-1036) . Mstislav's wife was Alanian the Anastasia. Mstislav was not without reason given the nickname Daredevil/Brave. In 1016, Mstislav participated in the conquest of the Crimea. In 1022, he fought victoriously with the Kasogs in modern Georgia. The King of the Kasogians Rededya challenged Mstislav to a hand-to-hand duel to avoid the victims of the angry troops, but in the fight Mstislav stabbed the enemy with a knife and the Kasogs swore allegiance to the Prince. In 1029, Mstislav defeated the Yasov/Alans in the North Caucasus. Then the Russ-Alan army appeared at the mouth of the Kura (Azerbaijan) and in 1031 invaded Armenia (Byzantium). In 1032-1033, this army participated in battles in the Caspian region . At that time, the co-ruler of Tmutarakan was Mstislav's son Eustathius. Thus, in the first half of the XI century, the Russian Princes rapidly mastered the Caucasus and Transcaucasia in a military alliance with local peoples. Mstislav allegedly died hunting and was buried in the Church of the Savior in Chernihiv. The Prince's grave has not been found in the cathedral.
The chronicle  says that Eustathius died in 1033, where he was buried is unknown. The author believes that Eustathius died in a religious sense. He could change his faith to Islam to advance his career among Muslims. The Prince disappeared from the field of view of Russian chroniclers. Perhaps his descendants lived in the East, having founded the Seljuk Kingdom in Eastern Bulgaria and Iran.
According to the author's reconstruction of history [7,10,11], the city Prusa (now Bursa) was the throne of Russ for many hundreds of years, and the province of Bithynia with the city of Nicaea were the family lands of Russ-Rurikovich-Flavians. After death of Constantine Monomachos/ Yaroslav the Wise in 1054, Russia lost the opportunity to dispose of its ancestral property and the right to the throne of Byzantium due to the opposition of the Greek party of the Empire. As a result, the Princes of Tmutarakan directed their efforts to create an independent state, called the Sultanate of Rum/Rome. It should be noted that the Bulgarian source confirms the Bulgarian origin of the Seljuk’s , because the Kin of Russ was a Christian branch of the dynasty coming from Ugyr Urus Aidar (the Great Horseman Igor), in Christianity name Leo, the eldest son of Emperor Constantine the Blind [10,11]. And then through his younger son Rurik (Lachin). In addition, Ugyr Urus Aidar [7,10,11] was the founder of the Quraysh family (ancestor of the Prophet Muhammad An-Nadr).
So, let’s identify the Princes of Russ with the Seljuk Begs within the framework of the proposed concept.
The forefather is identified by the author as Saint Vladimir, whose Bulgarian name is Kubar (Red Sun). In one of the versions, it's like Svyatoslav Igorevich. Tamgas and coats of arms of Princes were called Trident (Baltavar). On Fig. 1 shows the Tamgas (coats of arms) of Svyatoslav Igorevich (7), Vladimir Svyatoslavich (1-6) and Yaroslav the Wise (8) in the form of a bow, falcon or trident. In the East, the Tamgas of Svyatoslav and Vladimir could be called the Iron Bow (the nickname is Tuqaq). In addition, Vladimir/Kubar began his military career in the 960s as a Voivode and Beg of the Khazar Khaganate [10,11,13].
Fig. 1. Coats of arms (Tamga) of the first Rurikovich.
Consequently, the Arabs called Seljuk, including Mstislav the Brave, the son of St. Vladimir.
The author assumes that the Russian name of Prince Eustaphius Mstislavo Eustaphius vich was Mikhail. In 1033, he may have converted to Islam and settled in Eastern Bulgaria with the name Mikhail (Mikail in Bulgarian). Mikail's Sons/Eustathius began to rule in Khorasan and Iran. Chaghri Beg (Falcon) had sons – Alp Arslan (1030-1072), Kavurd-Beg (1031-1073) and possibly four more sons. Alp Arslan became the Sultan of the Seljuk Empire, and his brother Kavurd Beg assumed power in the Kerman Sultanate (1048-1196) in Iran. Eustathius and his descendants could be helped militarily by their closest relatives the Rurikovich Princes of Tmutarakan.
Mstislav is Brave had an older brother Yaroslav the Wise (978-1054). Accordingly, Eustaphius Mstislavovich also had a cousin – Vladimir Yaroslavich (1020-11052), baptized name Basil, and a nephew Rostislav Vladimirovich, baptized name Mikhail (1038-1067).
The author believes that the presence of a large number of sons of Yaroslav the Wise, as well as the birth of even more grandchildren, completely confused the Eastern chroniclers. The names of the Princes and all their relatives brought complete confusion to the identification of historical figures. Chroniclers could easily refer nephews to uncles and vice versa.
The dating of the life of Yaroslav the Wise's children is associated with the date of birth of his wife Ingegerd Olofsdother (1001). For example, Yaroslav the Wise, who was born in 978, allegedly married in 1019 and found a son Vladimir at the age of 42 in 1020. In addition, his son Vladimir Yaroslavovich became the Prince of Novgorod at a young age (10 years) in 1030. We are witnessing a chronological shift in the life of Yaroslav the Wise, the son of Tuqaq/Vladimir and the brother of Seljuk/Mstislav. Note that Eustaphius Mstislavich was born around the 1000, and his cousins, the sons of Yaroslav the Wise, are at least 20 years younger than him, although Yaroslav the Wise is Mstislav's older brother.
The historiography of the Seljuk Kingdom is saturated with legends and fictions in order to ensure the visible greatness and significance of a family of low origin. The chronicles are filled with small details – the number of camels, sheep and goats, gifts, small skirmishes and insults of the Begs. All this information is background in nature and is a complement of the authors of the annals. For example, the forefathers of the Seljuk’s Tuqaq and Seljuk were called Voivodes of the Khazar Khaganate, and were counted among Jews or Christians, which is partly true. In their youth, they were Voivodes and converted to Christianity, and Tuqaq (Vladimir/Basil) he was a great ruler of Europe, and at the end of his life he was known as the Co-Emperor of New Rome Basil is Bulgar Slayers .
So, the Eastern authors of the chronicles [1-3] claim that Seljuk had three or five sons with Christian names. Mstislav had one son, but many nephews. The most significant branch of the brothers was the sons of Yaroslav, Mstislav's older brother. There were seven of them in total, but four were related to Tmutarakan. We are talking about Svyatoslav Yaroslavich (1027-1076), Vladimir Yaroslavich (1020?-1078), Igor Yaroslavich (?-1060) and Vyacheslav Yaroslavich (1036-1057). They themselves did not reign in Tmutarakan, but their sons ruled – Gleb Svyatoslavich (?-1078), Prince of Tmutarakan (1054-1064, 1067-1068), Rostislav Vladimirovich (1038-1067), baptism name Mikhail, Prince of Tmutarakan (1064-1067), Boris Vyacheslavich (1054-1078), Prince of Tmutarakan (1077-1078) and David Igorevich the Violent (1058-1112), Prince of Tmutarakan (1081-1083). Rostislav Vladimirovich and David Igorevich were considered outcasts without rights to the thrones of Russ. Thus, we are witnessing a leap of rulers through a generation – the sons of Seljuk were not nephews, but grand-nephews.
An interesting episode is the blinding of a Russ Prince and one of the Sultans in the XI century. According to the Russ chronicles, Vasilko Rostislavovich (1066-1124) had two sons Ivan (died 1141) and Rostislav (d. 1141). For his ambitions, Vasilko was blinded in 1097 by order of his uncles – Svyatopolk Izyaslavich and David Igorevich the Violent. Sultan Masud Ghaznavi blinded his brother Muhammad in 1040 and imprisoned him. Then the throne returned to Muhammad, and Masud was chained . Perhaps in the Iranian chronicles, Mikhail's children were called Seljuk’s, and cousins (grandsons of Yaroslav the Wise) were counted among the Ghaznavids Sultans.
It is important to note that almost all the Princes of Tmutarakan were outcasts, that is, outcasts. Such a humiliating status said that these historical figures were building their destiny outside the borders of Ancient Russia. It should be understood that the localization of the Seljuk’s in Bukhara meant the legal claims of the Russ – Rurikovich to the possession of Eastern Bulgaria.
According to the Turkic legend, Seljuk died and was buried in the city of Jand near the Aral Sea. The prototype of the Seljuk figure Mstislav Vladimirovich the Brave is allegedly buried in Chernihiv, in the Transfiguration Cathedral , but his grave has not been found there. In addition, it is unknown where Eustathius is buried, as well as the father of Seljuk Tuqaq. The prototype of Tuqaq, Saint Vladimir, was laid to rest in the Tithe Church of Kiev.
The burial places of the rogue Princes are not exactly known, because they are not mentioned in the chronicles and are absent in the temples of Russia. Rostislav Vladimirovich is allegedly buried in the Church of the Theotokos in Tmutarakan. However, there are no Princely burials in the only church found in the ruins of the city.
Gleb Svyatoslavich is buried in Chernihiv behind the Spas . The supposed remains were examined on the Y-chromosome, which turned out to be from Haplogroup I2a , which contradict the relatedness of the relics with the Princely family of Rurik (Haplogroup N1). The graves of Roman Svyatoslavich and Boris Vyacheslavich are unknown. There is a dubious version that Oleg Svyatoslavich  is buried in the Transfiguration Cathedral of Chernihiv. After all, Oleg Svyatoslavich was in Tmutarakan, Bithynia, New Rome and was exiled to Rhodes . It is mentioned that he was captured by the Khazars. Oleg's fate was connected with the formation of the Konya Sultanate (Rum) with its capital in Nicaea (1077), then the capital was moved to Konya (1096) . David Igorevich the Violent, according to Karamzin , "was looking for loot and glory at sea," which means military affairs outside of Ancient Russia. There is no general opinion about the grave of David the Violent. Some believe that he died in Dorogobuzh in 1112, others believe  in Kiev in 1113 and was buried in the church of the Theotokos of Blachernae on Klova. There is no solid evidence of this.
In the eastern chronicles there is also no information about the burial places of the first Seljuk rulers. In the city of Rey (Iran) the Tughril Beg Tower has been standing in Iran for a thousand years. Someone considers it the tomb of Tughril/Rurik. Others call it the Tower of Caliph Yazid. It is doubtful that Sultan Tughril has found peace in Iran.
Consider the formation of the Seljuk Empire, taking into account the origin of the dynasty from the Rurik dynasty and the descendants of St. Vladimir.
We identify the Seljuk rulers, the founders of the Konya (Rum) Sultanate with the Russian Princes. The founder of the Sultanate is Suleiman ibn Qutalmish (ruled in 1077-1086). His father Qutalmish (d. 1064) was the son of Arslan/Israel (d. 1032) and the grandson of Seljuk. The author noted that Seljuk/Mstislav had one son and several nephews and many great-nephews, so figures from the Princes of Tmutarakan with a belligerent character and lack of information in the chronicles about their burials, families and heirs are suitable for the role of Arslan.
The author identifies Suleiman with Oleg I of Chernihiv (Svyatoslavich Gorislavich), baptized name Mikhail (1050?-1115), Prince of Tmutarakan (1083-1094). His father was Svyatoslav Yaroslavich, baptized name Nicholas (1027-1076), known in the chronicles of the Seljuk’s as Qutalmish. Accordingly, Qutalmish's father was Israel/Arslan Yabghu (d. 1032). Consequently, Israel is identified as the Russian Prince Yaroslav the Wise (978-1054). Note that the name Yaroslav is pronounced by Bulgars as Ar-Aslap , which is consonant with Arslan. However, Yaroslav the Wise is the son of Tuqaq/Vladimir and the brother of Seljuk/Mstislav, and not the son of Seljuk. Therefore, this ancestral tree of the Seljuk’s of the Sultans of Rum suggests that Seljuk is Saint Vladimir, and Tuqaq is Svyatoslav Igorevich.
Consider the fate of the children and descendants of Suleiman and Oleg Svyatoslavich. Suleiman had one son, Kilij Arslan (1079-1107), who had sons Melik-Shah/Shahinshah (1096-1118), Masud (1097-1156), Arab (1098-1129) and Tughril Arslan (1099-1129). Oleg Svyatoslavich found four sons – Igor Olgovich (d. 1147), Gleb Olgovich (1079-1138), Svyatoslav Olgovich (1106-1164) and Vsevolod Olgovich (1094-1146). Oleg's first wife was a Cuman’s Princess, and the Greek Theophano became the second. Probably, Gleb was the son of a Cuman’s Princess. There are no details of Gleb Olgovich's life in the chronicles, as there are no confirmations of his reign in Kursk, so the author identifies Gleb with Kilij Arslan.
Let's look at the information in the chronicles about Oleg/Suleiman and see how the meaning of events changes, depending on the commentator's interpretations. In April 1078, Oleg arrived in Tmutarakan , where his brother Roman Svyatoslavich and cousins Boris Vyacheslavich, the ruling Princes of the region, were. According to the TBY  Oleg fought with the Poles in 1076. And in 1078, the Prince brought the troops of the "filthy" Cumans to Russia :
"They caused great evil by shedding Christian blood, for which God will demand from them, and they will give an answer for the ruined Christian souls"
The author believes that Oleg led the allied forces of the Russ, Alans, Cumans and Oghus, who captured Nicaea and Nicodemia in 1075, marking the beginning of the Konya/Sultanate of Rum. Therefore, he commanded an army of Eastern peoples, who in Russia were counted among the Cumans, used by him to solve political problems.
Oleg Svyatoslavich's actions in Byzantium were caused by the desire to return the Imperial throne of New Rome to the family of Russ, lost after the death of Yaroslav the Wise/Constantine Monomachos, as well as the return of Prusa and Bithynia, belonging to the Russ – Flavian family since the IV century. As a result, Oleg found military allies among Muslims took the name Suleiman and in 1077-1086 headed Rum/Rome. Part of Oleg's allied troops was the soldiers of Volga Bulgaria led by Khan Adam p. 40, volume II .
Great Bulgaria - Great Israel, VII century.
It should be noted that for the first time the combined army of Russ, Bulgars (led by Khan Adam), Cumans, Alans and Oghuses entered the borders of Byzantium in 1071, where the battle of Manzikert took place . The Islamic troops were led by Alp Arslan and his cousin/brother Suleiman. During the battle, part of the Byzantine army defected to the enemy, including the Varangians, Bulgarians and Pechenegs – blood brothers and subjects of Oleg/Suleiman, Adam and Alp Arslan. Emperor Roman IV Diogenes was captured. He paid a lot of money for his release – 1.5 million gold coins in advance and then promised an annual tribute of 360 thousand gold. The Seljuk’s/Russian Princes received at their disposal considerable material resources for waging new wars of conquest and strengthening their power.
It is important to note that all the Russian Princes of Tmutarakan used the troops of the Cumans and Pechenegs in battles, and some of them married Cuman Princesses. In fact, this means that they led the armies of the peoples of the North Caucasus and the Caspian region. On the other hand, the Seljuk Sultans used a freelance army consisting of Ghilman in wars . Ghilman were called people from the Northern Black Sea region and the North Caucasus. The Ghilman were not slaves, but rather nobles of the Sultans, sometimes they were part of the personal guards and guards of the rulers. Accordingly, the armies of the Seljuk’s and Tmutarakan Princes were identical.
Therefore, the concept of the Tmutarakan region included eastern peoples, as well as vast expanses, from where there was access by land and sea to the Caucasus, Eastern Bulgars (Central Asia), Iran, Anatolia and Byzantium.
In 1079 or 1080, a revolt of the Varangian guard arose in Constantinople . At this time, the Emperor Nikephoros III Botaneiatas ruled. It is obvious that Oleg led the uprising of the Varangian guard, consisting mostly of Russians, in order to seize the throne of the Empire. The revolt failed, and Oleg was exiled by the Emperor to Rhodes. According to some sources , Oleg allegedly came to Constantinople in 1079 by force, captured by the Khazars in Tmutarakan. The author considers this argument ridiculous, because the Khazars were subordinated to Oleg and the Princes of Tmutarakan.
In 1081, the new Emperor Alexios I Komnenos, a cousin of the Princes of Russ, returned Oleg from imprisonment to Constantinople and married a noble Greek woman, Theaphano Mouzalon . Then, accompanied by the Imperial fleet, Oleg returned to Tmutarakan and expelled his cousin David Igorevich and nephew Volodar Rostislavich from there. Oleg Svyatoslavich/ Suleiman recognized the primacy of New Rome over himself and received the official Title of Archon of the eastern lands is "Matrahiya, Zikhiya and all Khazaria" .
According to eastern sources, Alexios Komnenos and Suleiman were in long-standing friendly relations , so they concluded an alliance agreement, according to which Nicodemia (the capital of Bithynia) remained in the power of Suleiman. This fact confirms the fidelity of the identification of Oleg and Suleiman, as well as the kindred friendship of Alexios Komnenos with Oleg and the legitimacy of the rights of the Russ family to Bithynia and Prusa city.
Some sources claim  that Suleiman committed suicide or was killed during an unsuccessful battle in Aleppo in 1086. A duplicate of Sultan named Oleg at that time returned to Tmutarakan, from where he began to claim the throne of Chernihiv. For several years he was not mentioned in the annals. In 1094, Oleg led the troops of the Cumans and Muslims for the third time  in a campaign against Vladimir Monomachos, which committed a sin against Christians. In 1094-1097, the internecine war in Russ continued. As a result, in 1097, a Council of Princes was held in Liubich, which proclaimed peace. After 1094, Oleg became the Prince of Chernihiv and Novgorod-Seversky. Oleg Svyatoslavich was participant in several congresses of Princes, made peace with the Cumans and died in 1115. He buried in Transfiguration Cathedral of Chernihiv.
The burial place and grave of Sultan Suleiman is unknown.
In 1092-1107, the Sultanate of Rum was headed by Suleiman/Oleg's son Sultan Kilij Arslan, aka Gleb Olgovich. Kilij Arslan allegedly drowned in the Khabur River with his horse during the battle  at the age of 27. Perhaps Sultan Kilij is buried in the Kubbetü's-Sultan tomb, which was built by Atabeg Humartash in Mayafarikin. Contemporaries claimed that Sultan Kilij Arslan was a tolerant Muslim or Christian, because his death brought grief to local Christians :
"His death caused great grief among Christians [of the East], because he was a kind husband and benevolent to believers at every opportunity"
Let's identify the ruling branch of the Seljuk dynasty, coming from Mikhail, Chaghri and Alp Arslan among the Rurikoviches, taking into account the chronological shift by one generation, based on traditional historiography.
The author has already written that the variant of the origin of the Seljuk’s branch from Mikhail, identified with Eustaphius, has no confirmation in the Russian annals, therefore it is possible to focus only on eastern sources. The accuracy of the details of the description of the origin and life of Mikhail, Tughril, Chaghri and Alp Arslan is questionable, as well as the dating of the life of these figures. For example, in the battles with the Byzantines, Alp Arslan (1030-1072) is described as the head of the Seljuk army, who had a cousin Suleiman (1050?-1086) under his command, although, according to the author, he should be older than Alp Arslan.
The second variant of the appearance of the main branch of the Seljuk’s corresponds to the origin of the nephew of the Seljuk’s/Mstislav the Brave named Vladimir Yaroslavich, son of Yaroslav the Wise, aka Israel or Ar-Aslap.
The biography of Vladimir Yaroslavich is covered with the darkness of lies, because theoretically he was the eldest son of Yaroslav the Wise with a claim to the Title of Grand Prince in Kiev, but he became only the Prince of Novgorod and was on the sidelines all his life. The author is convinced that Vladimir Yaroslavich is the youngest son of Yaroslav's first wife named Anna , captured in Kiev by Boleslav of Poland in 1018. Eldest son Ilya died at the Principality in Novgorod in 1020. Consequently, Vladimir Yaroslavich was born around 1000, and not in 1020 . Formally, Anna lost her honor, so her sons Ilya and Vladimir received a pejorative status.
Vladimir became the Prince of Novgorod in 1030 at the age of about 30, and not a child at 10. He also participated in the campaign against Byzantium in 1043, not as a 23-year-old youth, but as an adult warrior 43 years old. Vladimir Yaroslavich's wife is not known. The only son of the Prince named Rostislav Vladimirovich, baptized name Mikhail, could have been born around 1020, and died in 1067. Accordingly, Mikhail, aka Mikail ibn Seljuk, is the great-nephew of Seljuk, or Tuqaq in this family tree Yaroslav the Wise. Michael had three sons, and Mikail had two. The eldest sons were called Falcon – in Russ it was Rurik (1040-1092), and in the East Tughril (?-1063). Both Princes had no children. Rurik Rostislavich was an outcast until 1084.
According to the author's reconstruction, Rurik /Tughril left the East after 1063 and returned to Russia. This decision was caused by the death of Mikhail's father, Prince of Tmutarakan, who was poisoned by Greek from the Crimea in 1064. Eastern authors claim that Mikail died in 1009, which is ridiculous. But the source  believes that Mikail participated in the battle in 1035.
The second son of Mikhail named Volodar Rostislavich (1041?-1124) had two sons – Vladimir (1104-1153) and Rostislav (?-1128). The date of Vladimir Volodarevich's birth reveals a forgery of the chronicle, which contradicts reality. Father Volodar Rostislavovich allegedly unexpectedly lived more than 80 years, but at the same time he was Prince of Tmutarakan only in 1081-1083.
Theoretically, Vladimir Volodarovich should claim the role of Alp Arslan, but historians have thrown him far into the future, making such an assumption obviously erroneous. According to the author's boldest estimates, Vladimir/Alp Arslan was born around 1060 and could not carry out the capture of the Armenian capital Ani in 1064 and lead the Turkic troops in 1071, as well as command his relative Suleiman. In the TBY  there is no data about Vladimir Volodarievich, and information from later Russian sources corresponds to a duplicate of the figure of Vladimir of a different pedigree. The Prince's burial place is unknown. In fact, the identity of Alp Arslan/Vladimir and his children disappeared from the annals of Russia. This indicates a possible change of faith by Vladimir and living in the East.
Consequently, either the chronicles of the Seljuk’s and Russ of the second half of the XI century are the result of a complement of Russian and Western historians, or the figure of Alp Arslan is given a false family tree, or both versions are true.
As an option, the author suggests considering possible candidates for the person of Alp Arslan among other Russ Princes from the family of Yaroslav the Wise. According to the years of life and death at the hands of the allies it is Prince Roman Svyatoslavich the Handsome (1048/1052-1079), Prince of Tmutarakan (1069-1079). The date of Roman's birth is not exactly known, researchers believe it to be in 1052. However, his father Svyatoslav Yaroslavich (1027-1076) married Cilicia early. Roman was the second oldest son and could have been born in 1048-1049. Therefore, the date of the Prince's birth should be omitted for 1048. Roman the Handsome is mentioned twice in the TBY  for 1077 and 1079, when he was Prince of Tmutarakan, and then was killed by allied Cumans in unknown lands.
So, the figure of Alp Arslan of the Eastern chronicles corresponds to the personality of Roman the Handsome, Mikhail's/Mikail cousin, the great-nephew of Seljuk/Mstislav the Brave. Roman could take part in the capture of the Armenian capital Ani (1064), in the conquest of Georgian lands in 1068 and lead the allied army of Alp Arslan and Suleiman, his second cousin Oleg Svyatoslavich, in the Battle of Manzikert (1071).
The Russian chronicles mention the battle of Nezhatina Niva/Field (1078), where several Tmutarakan Princes participated in the battle, some of whom died – Boris and Gleb. The localization of the Nezhatina Niva is unknown. The author believes that the battle could have taken place in Asia Minor. Part of the chronicles of Russ and the Princes of Tmutarakan were included in the annals of the Seljuk’s and vice versa. It is possible that the internecine wars of the Russ Princes in 1078-1079 and 1097-1100 are duplicates of the wars and conquests of the Seljuk’s during the formation of the Konya/Sultanate of Rum and the Sultanate in Iran.
We will summarize the data obtained on the Princes and Sultans of the Sultanate of Rum in Table No. 2.
We will summarize three versions of the data on the Seljuk Princes and Sultans in Table No. 3.
Conclusions of our research: The author's hypothesis about the origin of the Seljuk Dynasty from among the Russian Princes of Tmutarakan, descendants of St. Vladimir, was fully confirmed. The forefathers of the Seljuk’s were St. Vladimir and Yaroslav the Wise. Sultan Suleiman is identified with Oleg I of Chernihiv (Oleg Svyatoslavich), and Sultan Alp Arslan is identified with Roman Svyatoslavich Handsome. In the XI century, Princes of Tmutarakan controlled vast territories of Khazaria, Caucasus, Central Asia, Asia Minor and Iran. By the end of the XI century, with the adoption of Islam, the Seljuk’s formed Empires independent of Russ. The correctness of the author's hypothesis can be confirmed by testing the DNA of the Y-chromosome of the relics of the first Seljuk Sultans, which should belong to Haplogroup N1.
Pr. Dr. Valeriy Viktorovich Kubarev. 24.05–12.06.2023.
1. Рашид Ад-Дин/ Rashid al-Din Hamadani.
2. Садр Ад-Дин Ал-Хусайни, Сообщения о сельджукском государстве, сливки летописей, сообщающих о сельджукских эмирах и государях.
3. Абу-ль-Фарадж (Бар Эбрей)/ Gregory Bar Hebraeus.
4. Saeed Shirazi. A CONCISE HISTORY OF IRAN: From the early period to the present time. — Ketab.com, 2017-01-06. — 355 с. — ISBN 978-1-59584-600-6.
5. Canby, Sheila R.; Beyazit, Deniz; Rugiadi, Martina; Peacock, A. C. S. Court and Cosmos: The Great Age of the Seljuqs (англ.). — Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2016. — ISBN 9781588395894.
6. The Primary Chronicle. Tale of Bygone Years / Повесть временных лет.
7. Kubarev V.V., Vedas of Russ, IP MEDIA, M., 2009. ISBN 9781-93252567-0. Link: http://www.kubarev.ru/en/content/251.htm
8. Изборник Святослава 1073 г. / Факсимильное изд. под ред. Л.П. Жуковской. М., 1983. Л. 1-1 об; НПЛ. С. 18 (6586), 20 (6623); Печать с надписью «Господи, помози Михаилу, архонту Матрахии, Зихии и всей Хазарии» II Янин. Печати: Т. 1. № 29; Печать с надписью «Господи, помози Михаилу, архонту Тмутаракани».
9. Захаров В. А. Тмутараканское княжество // Сборник Русского исторического общества. — М.: Русская панорама, 2002. — Т. 4 (152). — С. 56—84.
10. Kubarev V.V., Origin of the gens Rurik, East European Scientific Journal (Warsaw, Poland), #10 (50), 2019 part 9. pp. 9–39. Link: https://eesa–journal.com/wp–content/uploads/EESA_1050_oct_2019_part_9.pdf
11. Kubarev V.V., Emperors Lekapenos (920–945), East European Scientific Journal (Warsaw, Poland), #1 (65), 2021 part 6. pp. 26–39. Link: https://eesa-journal.com/wp-content/uploads/EESA_1_65_january_2021_part_6.pdf
12. А. А. Кудрявцев, Т. А. Невская, Ю. А. Прокопенко. Из истории народов Северного Кавказа: сборник научных статей. — Ставрополь: Ставропольский гос. университет, 2000, 2000. — Т. 3. — С. 35.
13. Бахши Иман, Джагфар Тарыхи (Летописи Джагфара) Гази–Барадж Тарыхи (Летопись Гази–Бараджа), I – III том. Бахши Иман. Джагфар Тарихы. Свод булгарских летописей 1680 г. / Изд. подготовлено Ф. Г.–Х. Нурутдиновым. Оренбург: Редакция Вестника Болгария, 1993. Том II, стр. 40.
14. I-Y91535 YTree, id:VK542. Link: https://www.yfull.com/tree/I-Y91535/
15. Карпов А. Ю. Владимир Мономах. — М.: Молодая гвардия, 2015. — 384 с. — ISBN 978-5-235-03755-7, стр. 153.
16. Литаврин Г. Г. Византия и славяне. — СПб.: Алетейя, 1999. — 604 с. — ISBN 5-89329-110-7, стр. 501.
17. Гордлевский В. А. Государство Сельджукидов Малой Азии. — Л.: Академии Наук СССР, 1941. — 200 с.
18. Карамзин Н.М. История государства Российского. — Т. II. — С. 74.
19. М. Д. Хмыров. «Алфавитно-справочный перечень Государей Русских и замечательнейших особ их крови». СПб. 1870 г.
20. Димник, Мартин (1994). Черниговская династия, 1054–1146 гг. Папский институт средневековых исследований. ISBN 0-88844-116-9.
21. Ричард Эрнест Дюпюи, Тревор Невитт Дюпюи. Война. Полная энциклопедия. Все битвы, сражения и военные кампании мировой истории с 4-го тысячелетия до нашей эры до конца XX века / Перевод: Кац Е. А., Анваер А. Н.. — М.: Центрполиграф, 2015. — 1184 с. — ISBN 978-5-227-06272-7.
22. Daniel Pipes (1981). Slave Soldiers and Islam: The Genesis of a Military System. pp. 35, 45.ISBN 0300024479.
23. Голубовский П. В. История Северской Земли до половины XIV столетия. — Киев: Университетская тип. И. И. Завадского, 1881. — 209 с.
24. Райс Тамара Т. Сельджуки. Кочевники — завоеватели Малой Азии. — М.: Центрполиграф, 2004. — 238 с. — ISBN 5-9524-0949-0.
25. Peacock, Andrew (2013). The Seljuks of Anatolia: Court and Society in the Medieval Middle East. I.B. Tauris.
26. Demirkent I. Kilicarslan I//Islam Ansiklopedisi.–2022.–Vol. 25.–S. 396-399.
27. Matthieu (D'Edesse). Chronique de Matthieu d'Edesse 962-1136 avec la continuation de Grégoire le Prêtre jusqu'en 1162, d'après trois manuscrits de la Bibliothèque impériale de Paris. — Paris: A. Durand, 1858. — 591 p.
28. Титмар Мерзебургский. Хроника. Кн. 8, гл. 32/ Thietmar of Merseburg.
Monument to the Sultan of Rum Suleiman,
he is Prince Oleg Svyatoslavovich.
Image of Sultan Alp-Arslan, he is
Prince Roman Svyatoslavich the Handsome.
Below we provide photographs of the sculptures of the first Sultans of the Suljuks in the representation of the Turkmens, who appropriated the rights of kinship with the Seljuks. The greatness and pathos of the self-consciousness of the Turkic peoples is impressive when the facts say otherwise.